Filed: Aug. 15, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-50007 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, Versus JORGE VARGAS-AGUILERA,, also known as Jorge Vargas-Aguilar, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-00-CR-1423-ALL-DB - - - - - - - - - - August 14, 2001 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to repre
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-50007 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, Versus JORGE VARGAS-AGUILERA,, also known as Jorge Vargas-Aguilar, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-00-CR-1423-ALL-DB - - - - - - - - - - August 14, 2001 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to repres..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-50007
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
Versus
JORGE VARGAS-AGUILERA,, also known as
Jorge Vargas-Aguilar,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. EP-00-CR-1423-ALL-DB
- - - - - - - - - -
August 14, 2001
Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jorge
Vargas-Aguilera (Vargas) has moved for leave to withdraw and has
filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Vargas has received a copy of counsel’s motion and
brief.
Vargas, who pleaded guilty to violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326, has
stated that he wishes to challenge only his sentence. Our
independent review of the brief and the record discloses no
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-50007
-2-
nonfrivolous sentencing issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.