Filed: Sep. 11, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-30802 CALVIN WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus ORMET PRIMARY ALUMINUM CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Middle District of Louisiana (97-CV-1006) September 7, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* We affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the trial court. An arbitrator has set aside defendant’s termination. We, of course, express n
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-30802 CALVIN WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus ORMET PRIMARY ALUMINUM CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Middle District of Louisiana (97-CV-1006) September 7, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* We affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the trial court. An arbitrator has set aside defendant’s termination. We, of course, express no..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-30802 CALVIN WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus ORMET PRIMARY ALUMINUM CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Middle District of Louisiana (97-CV-1006) September 7, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* We affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the trial court. An arbitrator has set aside defendant’s termination. We, of course, express no opinion on its validity. AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
