Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Flores-De La Cruz, 00-51202 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 00-51202 Visitors: 70
Filed: Sep. 20, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-51202 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GERARDO ANTONIO FLORES-DE LA CRUZ, also known as Jose Delaluz Zubia, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (EP-00-CR-798-ALL) _ September 20, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Gerardo Antonio Flores-De La Cruz a/k/a Jose Delaluz
More
                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                               No. 00-51202
                             Summary Calendar



                        UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                        Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                   versus

  GERARDO ANTONIO FLORES-DE LA CRUZ, also known as Jose Delaluz
                              Zubia,

                                             Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________________________________

           Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Western District of Texas
                         (EP-00-CR-798-ALL)
_________________________________________________________________
                         September 20, 2001
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Court-appointed counsel for Gerardo Antonio Flores-De La Cruz

a/k/a Jose Delaluz Zubia has requested leave to withdraw as counsel

and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).     Flores-De La Cruz has not filed a response.                  Our

independent    review   of   the   brief   and   the   record    discloses    no

nonfrivolous issue.      Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw   is     GRANTED,     counsel      is    excused       from   further

responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED.



     *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer