Filed: Oct. 30, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-31477 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE GUADALUPE RAMIREZ-VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 00-CR-20046 - - - - - - - - - - October 29, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed appellate counsel for Jose Guadalupe Ramirez-Vasquez (“Ra
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-31477 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE GUADALUPE RAMIREZ-VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 00-CR-20046 - - - - - - - - - - October 29, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed appellate counsel for Jose Guadalupe Ramirez-Vasquez (“Ram..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-31477
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE GUADALUPE RAMIREZ-VASQUEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 00-CR-20046
- - - - - - - - - -
October 29, 2001
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed appellate counsel for Jose Guadalupe
Ramirez-Vasquez (“Ramirez-Vasquez”) has filed a motion for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ramirez-Vasquez has not filed a
response.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses
no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 00-31477
-2-
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.