Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Santana-Huerta, 00-41380 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 00-41380 Visitors: 19
Filed: Oct. 30, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-41380 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARIO GREGORIO SANTANA-HUERTA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-00-CR-313-1 - October 29, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Mario Gregorio Santana-Huerta appeals the 57-month sentence imposed following his plea of guilty to a charge of
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 00-41380
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARIO GREGORIO SANTANA-HUERTA,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. B-00-CR-313-1
                       --------------------
                         October 29, 2001

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Mario Gregorio Santana-Huerta appeals the 57-month sentence

imposed following his plea of guilty to a charge of being found

in the United States after deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326.   He contends that the felony conviction that resulted in

his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) was an element

of the offense that should have been charged in the indictment.

     Santana-Huerta acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed

by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United

States, 
523 U.S. 224
(1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 00-41380
                               -2-

for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v.

New Jersey, 
120 S. Ct. 2348
(2000).

     Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres.   See 
Apprendi, 120 S. Ct. at 2362
; United States v. Dabeit, 
231 F.3d 979
, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 
121 S. Ct. 1214
(2001).   Santana-

Huerta’s argument is foreclosed.   The judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer