Filed: Oct. 30, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-41406 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RALPH FLORES, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:99-CR-18-4 - October 29, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel representing Ralph Flores has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-41406 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RALPH FLORES, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:99-CR-18-4 - October 29, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel representing Ralph Flores has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U...
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-41406
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RALPH FLORES,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:99-CR-18-4
--------------------
October 29, 2001
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel representing Ralph Flores has moved for leave to
withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Flores has received a copy of
counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our
independent review of the brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
