Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Garcia-Carrera, 00-41459 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 00-41459 Visitors: 62
Filed: Oct. 30, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-41459 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LEONARDO GARCIA-CARRERA, also known as Pedro Hernandez-Garcia Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-00-CR-309-1 - October 29, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Leonardo Garcia-Carrera appeals the 100-month sentence imposed following his ple
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 00-41459
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LEONARDO GARCIA-CARRERA, also known as
Pedro Hernandez-Garcia

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. B-00-CR-309-1
                       --------------------
                         October 29, 2001

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Leonardo Garcia-Carrera appeals the 100-month sentence

imposed following his plea of guilty to a charge of being found

in the United States after deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326.   He contends that the felony conviction that resulted in

his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) was an element

of the offense that should have been charged in the indictment.

     Garcia acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by the

Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States,


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 00-41459
                                -2-

523 U.S. 224
(1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for

Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 
530 U.S. 466
(2000).

     Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres.   See 
Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 489-90
; United States v. Dabeit, 
231 F.3d 979
, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 
121 S. Ct. 1214
(2001).   Torres’s

argument is foreclosed.   The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer