United States v. Alvarez-Paz, 01-40104 (2001)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 01-40104
Visitors: 14
Filed: Oct. 17, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-40104 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE RAUL ALVAREZ-PAZ, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (M-00-CR-430) October 17, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Alvarez-Paz appeals his sentence for possession with intent to distribute marijuana. He argues that his sentence should not have b
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-40104 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE RAUL ALVAREZ-PAZ, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (M-00-CR-430) October 17, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Alvarez-Paz appeals his sentence for possession with intent to distribute marijuana. He argues that his sentence should not have be..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-40104
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE RAUL ALVAREZ-PAZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
(M-00-CR-430)
October 17, 2001
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Alvarez-Paz appeals his sentence for possession with intent to
distribute marijuana. He argues that his sentence should not have
been enhanced for possession of a dangerous weapon because the
firearms found near him were not in plain view. He also claims that
he did not know that firearms were located nearby or that his co-
defendant possessed firearms.
Alvarez-Paz’s allegations at most establish that it is
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
possible that the firearms present at the time of his arrest were
not connected with the offense, not that it is clearly improbable
that the firearms were connected with the offense, as is required.1
The district court’s determination was not clearly erroneous.
AFFIRMED.
1
U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1 cmt. n.3.
Source: CourtListener