Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Orosco-Gonzalez, 01-50210 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-50210 Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 30, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-50210 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus HUMBERTO OROSCO-GONZALEZ, also known as Matias Gonzalez-Macias, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-00-CR-1620-DB - - - - - - - - - - October 29, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 01-50210
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HUMBERTO OROSCO-GONZALEZ, also known as Matias
Gonzalez-Macias,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       - - - - - - - - - -
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Texas
                    USDC No. EP-00-CR-1620-DB
                       - - - - - - - - - -
                         October 29, 2001

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Humberto

Orosco-Gonzalez has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).

Orosco-Gonzalez has responded to the motion by requesting

appointment of substitute counsel.   Our independent review of the

brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities, defendant’s motion for


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                            No. 01-50210
                                 -2-

appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED, and the appeal is

DISMISSED.

     MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL

DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer