Filed: Dec. 13, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-41410 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus REGINALD TROY WALKER, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. V-00-CR-7-1 - - - - - - - - - - December 12, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Reginald Troy Walker has mo
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-41410 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus REGINALD TROY WALKER, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. V-00-CR-7-1 - - - - - - - - - - December 12, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Reginald Troy Walker has mov..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-41410
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
REGINALD TROY WALKER,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. V-00-CR-7-1
- - - - - - - - - -
December 12, 2001
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Reginald
Troy Walker has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Walker
has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not
filed a response.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses
no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.