Filed: Dec. 13, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-41464 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE GABRIEL ORTIZ RAMIREZ, also known as Francisco Capdsan, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-00-CR-291-1 - December 12, 2001 Before HIGGINGBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jose Gabriel Ortiz Ramirez pleaded guilty to an indictment charging him
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-41464 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE GABRIEL ORTIZ RAMIREZ, also known as Francisco Capdsan, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-00-CR-291-1 - December 12, 2001 Before HIGGINGBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jose Gabriel Ortiz Ramirez pleaded guilty to an indictment charging him f..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-41464
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE GABRIEL ORTIZ RAMIREZ, also known as Francisco Capdsan,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. B-00-CR-291-1
--------------------
December 12, 2001
Before HIGGINGBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jose Gabriel Ortiz Ramirez pleaded guilty to an indictment
charging him for being an alien found unlawfully in the United
States following deportation. Ramirez has appealed his sentence.
Ramirez's sentence was enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C.
§ 1326(b)(2) because he was convicted for an aggravated felony
prior to his deportation. Ramirez contends that the prior felony
conviction was an element of the offense that should have been
charged in the indictment. Ramirez acknowledges that his
argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in
Almendarez-Torres v. United States,
523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 00-41464
-2-
seeks to preserve the issue for further review in light of
Apprendi v. New Jersey,
530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). Apprendi did
not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See
Apprendi, 530 U.S. at
489-90; United States v. Dabeit,
231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir.
2000), cert. denied,
121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001).
AFFIRMED.