Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. McNutt Company, 20341_1 (1963)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 20341_1 Visitors: 21
Filed: Dec. 20, 1963
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 324 F.2d 957 64-1 USTC P 9138 COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. McNUTT-BOYCE COMPANY, Respondent. No. 20341. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. Dec. 20, 1963. Crane C. Hauser, Chief Counsel, I.R.S., Glen E. Hardy, Atty., I.R.S., Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, David O. Walter, William A. Friedlander, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Junius H. Payne, Jr., Alexandria, La., Gerald D. Morgan, Arthur Peter, Jr., Lee I. Park,
More

324 F.2d 957

64-1 USTC P 9138

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner,
v.
McNUTT-BOYCE COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 20341.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 20, 1963.

Crane C. Hauser, Chief Counsel, I.R.S., Glen E. Hardy, Atty., I.R.S., Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, David O. Walter, William A. Friedlander, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Junius H. Payne, Jr., Alexandria, La., Gerald D. Morgan, Arthur Peter, Jr., Lee I. Park, Washington, D.C., Hamel, Morgan, Park & Saunders, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before RIVES, JONES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This controversy between a taxpayer and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue was ably discussed and properly decided by the Tax Court. McNutt-Boyce Company v. Commissioner, 38 T.C. 462. Its decision is

2

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer