Case: 13-50338      Document: 00512454344         Page: 1    Date Filed: 11/26/2013




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT


                                      No. 13-50338
                                   c/w No. 13-50340
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                  Summary Calendar                              FILED
                                                                        November 26, 2013
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                       Clerk

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAUL SANCHEZ-HUERTA,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                  Appeals from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                            USDC No. 2:11-CR-1607-1
                            USDC No. 2:12-CR-1769-1


Before REAVLEY, JONES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Raul Sanchez-Huerta (Sanchez) has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 

(1967), and United States v. Flores, 

(5th
Cir. 2011). Sanchez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 13-50338    Document: 00512454344      Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/26/2013


                                No. 13-50338
                              c/w No. 13-50340

counsel’s assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for
appellate review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                      2