Filed: Dec. 17, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-40154 Document: 00512473389 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 17, 2013 No. 13-40154 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. LUIS FRANCISCO ARBAIZA-CASTILLO, also known as Luis Arbaiza, also known as Eduardo Vasquez, also known as Manuel Quiroz, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
Summary: Case: 13-40154 Document: 00512473389 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 17, 2013 No. 13-40154 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. LUIS FRANCISCO ARBAIZA-CASTILLO, also known as Luis Arbaiza, also known as Eduardo Vasquez, also known as Manuel Quiroz, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern ..
More
Case: 13-40154 Document: 00512473389 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 17, 2013
No. 13-40154
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
LUIS FRANCISCO ARBAIZA-CASTILLO, also known as Luis Arbaiza, also
known as Eduardo Vasquez, also known as Manuel Quiroz,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:12-CR-643-1
Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Luis Francisco
Arbaiza-Castillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v.
Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Arbaiza-Castillo has not filed a response.
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 13-40154 Document: 00512473389 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
No. 13-40154
no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2