Filed: Dec. 17, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-40023 Document: 00512473265 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 17, 2013 No. 13-40023 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE HERNANDEZ-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:12-CR-222-1 Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CU
Summary: Case: 13-40023 Document: 00512473265 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 17, 2013 No. 13-40023 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE HERNANDEZ-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:12-CR-222-1 Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CUR..
More
Case: 13-40023 Document: 00512473265 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 17, 2013
No. 13-40023
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JOSE HERNANDEZ-PEREZ,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:12-CR-222-1
Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Jose Hernandez-Perez (Hernandez)
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Hernandez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 13-40023 Document: 00512473265 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
No. 13-40023
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2