United States v. George Williams, 13-40167 (2014)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 13-40167
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jan. 08, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-40167 Document: 00512493343 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/08/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 13-40167 January 8, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. GEORGE RAYMOND WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:12-CR-177 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The judgme
Summary: Case: 13-40167 Document: 00512493343 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/08/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 13-40167 January 8, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. GEORGE RAYMOND WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:12-CR-177 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The judgmen..
More
Case: 13-40167 Document: 00512493343 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/08/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 13-40167 January 8, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. GEORGE RAYMOND WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:12-CR-177 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The judgment of the district court is affirmed. Contrary to defendant’s contention, the sentence did not delegate to the probation officer the decision about mental health treatment. The judge during sentencing did indicate his intention to leave at least the ministerial details of the sentence to a probation officer; but counsel having pointed out a problem, the documented sentence is unobjectionable as it clarified that the district court only deemed mental health treatment needed. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 13-40167 Document: 00512493343 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/08/2014 No. 13-40167 AFFIRMED. 2
Source: CourtListener
