Donald Hill v. Walgreens Company, 13-10983 (2014)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 13-10983
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 20, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-10983 Document: 00512501913 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/15/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 13-10983 Fifth Circuit FILED Summary Calendar January 15, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk DONALD EUGENE HILL, Plaintiff-Appellant v. WALGREENS COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:13-CV-2788 Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Becaus
Summary: Case: 13-10983 Document: 00512501913 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/15/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 13-10983 Fifth Circuit FILED Summary Calendar January 15, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk DONALD EUGENE HILL, Plaintiff-Appellant v. WALGREENS COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:13-CV-2788 Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Because..
More
Case: 13-10983 Document: 00512501913 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/15/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 13-10983 Fifth Circuit FILED Summary Calendar January 15, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk DONALD EUGENE HILL, Plaintiff-Appellant v. WALGREENS COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:13-CV-2788 Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Because no error is shown in the order of the district judge, it is affirmed. AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener