Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ottis Mayo Jones v. Gertrude Bales, 72-3333 (1973)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 72-3333 Visitors: 27
Filed: Feb. 21, 1973
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 480 F.2d 805 Ottis Mayo JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gertrude BALES et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 72-3333. Summary Calendar. * United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Feb. 21, 1973. Ottis Mayo Jones, pro se. Gertrude Bales, pro se. Louis C. Woolf, Knoxville, Tenn., and John E. Dougherty, Atlanta, Ga., for Cheatham and Waggoner. John W. Stokes, Jr., U. S. Atty., and Beverly B. Bates, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for Kirksey and Taylor. Before GEWIN, COLEMAN and MORGAN, Circuit Ju
More

480 F.2d 805

Ottis Mayo JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Gertrude BALES et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 72-3333. Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 21, 1973.

Ottis Mayo Jones, pro se.

Gertrude Bales, pro se.

Louis C. Woolf, Knoxville, Tenn., and John E. Dougherty, Atlanta, Ga., for Cheatham and Waggoner.

John W. Stokes, Jr., U. S. Atty., and Beverly B. Bates, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for Kirksey and Taylor.

Before GEWIN, COLEMAN and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of the reasons stated and authorities cited in the final order, Jones v. Bales, N.D.Ga.1972, 58 F.R.D. 453.

*

Rule 18, 5 Cir.; Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer