Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Candace Clark, 13-10227 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 13-10227 Visitors: 50
Filed: Feb. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-10227 Document: 00512539814 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 13-10227 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 21, 2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. CANDACE CLARK, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:11-CR-31-2 Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
More
     Case: 13-10227      Document: 00512539814         Page: 1    Date Filed: 02/21/2014




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT


                                    No. 13-10227
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                         February 21, 2014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CANDACE CLARK,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 5:11-CR-31-2


Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Candace Clark has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967), and United States v. Flores, 
632 F.3d 229
(5th
Cir. 2011). Clark has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 13-10227    Document: 00512539814    Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/21/2014


                                No. 13-10227

appellate review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                      2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer