Filed: Jan. 11, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-30580 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ELTON LEE, Defendant- Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 00-CR-196-3-F - January 10, 2002 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and STEWART, Circuit Judges: PER CURIAM:* The Assistant Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Elton Lee has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as req
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-30580 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ELTON LEE, Defendant- Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 00-CR-196-3-F - January 10, 2002 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and STEWART, Circuit Judges: PER CURIAM:* The Assistant Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Elton Lee has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as requ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-30580
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ELTON LEE,
Defendant-
Appellant.
-------------------------------------------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
USDC No. 00-CR-196-3-F
-------------------------------------------------------
January 10, 2002
Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and STEWART, Circuit Judges:
PER CURIAM:*
The Assistant Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Elton Lee has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lee has
filed a response requesting the appointment of substitute counsel, which is DENIED. Our
independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.