Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Lee, 01-30580 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-30580 Visitors: 19
Filed: Jan. 11, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-30580 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ELTON LEE, Defendant- Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 00-CR-196-3-F - January 10, 2002 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and STEWART, Circuit Judges: PER CURIAM:* The Assistant Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Elton Lee has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as req
More
                      IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                  FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                                          No. 01-30580
                                        Summary Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                                Plaintiff-Appellee,
                                               versus



ELTON LEE,

                                                                              Defendant-
Appellant.

                    -------------------------------------------------------
                     Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Eastern District of Louisiana
                               USDC No. 00-CR-196-3-F
                    -------------------------------------------------------
                                     January 10, 2002
Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and STEWART, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:*

       The Assistant Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Elton Lee has moved for leave

to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Lee has

filed a response requesting the appointment of substitute counsel, which is DENIED.            Our

independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly,

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




       *
           Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer