Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Spencer, Inc. v. Sarah Kendrick Kennington, 21297_1 (1964)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 21297_1 Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 12, 1964
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 337 F.2d 289 SPENCER, INC., Appellant, v. Sarah Kendrick KENNINGTON, Appellee. No. 21297. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. Oct. 12, 1964. H. P. Burt, Albany, Ga., Burt & Burt, Albany, Ga., for appellant. Marcus B. Calhoun, Thomasville, Ga., Forester & Calhoun, Thomasville, Ga., for appellee. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, BELL, Circuit Judge, and WHITEHURST, District Judge. PER CURIAM. 1 The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. It was not error for the trial court to overrule the m
More

337 F.2d 289

SPENCER, INC., Appellant,
v.
Sarah Kendrick KENNINGTON, Appellee.

No. 21297.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 12, 1964.

H. P. Burt, Albany, Ga., Burt & Burt, Albany, Ga., for appellant.

Marcus B. Calhoun, Thomasville, Ga., Forester & Calhoun, Thomasville, Ga., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, BELL, Circuit Judge, and WHITEHURST, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. It was not error for the trial court to overrule the motion for summary judgment. The issue whether appellant's employee was an agent of appellant acting within the scope of her employment at the time of the collision is a fact question which has been resolved by the jury upon a proper submission of the applicable law to it.

2

The judgment is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer