Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Robert L. Strauss v. United States, 20752 (1964)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 20752 Visitors: 16
Filed: Nov. 04, 1964
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 337 F.2d 853 Robert L. STRAUSS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 20752. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. November 4, 1964. Arthur B. Cunningham, Miami, Fla., James M. Roberts, Atlanta, Ga., for appellant. Kirby W. Patterson, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Lloyd G. Bates, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for appellee. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, JONES and GEWIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 This is an appeal from the denial by the trial court of
More

337 F.2d 853

Robert L. STRAUSS, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 20752.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

November 4, 1964.

Arthur B. Cunningham, Miami, Fla., James M. Roberts, Atlanta, Ga., for appellant.

Kirby W. Patterson, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Lloyd G. Bates, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, JONES and GEWIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

This is an appeal from the denial by the trial court of a motion for new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. We are unable to hold that the trial court erred in light of the strict requirements for the granting of such extraordinary motions. See Ledet v. United States, 5 Cir., 297 F.2d 737, and Newman v. United States, 5 Cir., 238 F.2d 861.

2

The judgment is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer