Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Larue Johnson, 13-40828 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 13-40828 Visitors: 19
Filed: Apr. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-40828 Document: 00512590372 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/09/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 13-40828 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 9, 2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. LARUE JOHNSON, also known as Juggy, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:09-CR-641-1 Before OWEN, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PE
More
     Case: 13-40828      Document: 00512590372         Page: 1    Date Filed: 04/09/2014




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT


                                    No. 13-40828
                                  Summary Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                             April 9, 2014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LARUE JOHNSON, also known as Juggy,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 2:09-CR-641-1


Before OWEN, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       In June 2010, Larue Johnson, federal prisoner # 64812-279, was
convicted by guilty plea for possession with intent to distribute 92.4 grams of
cocaine base and was sentenced to 120 months of imprisonment and five years
of supervised release. He now requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis
(IFP) from the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion, in
which he sought a sentence reduction pursuant to the Fair Sentencing Act of


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
     Case: 13-40828        Document: 00512590372          Page: 2     Date Filed: 04/09/2014


                                        No. 13-40828

2010 (FSA). By moving to proceed IFP, Johnson challenges the district court’s
implicit certification that the appeal was not taken in good faith. See Baugh
v. Taylor, 
117 F.3d 197
, 202 (5th Cir. 1997).
       The Government has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal due to
Johnson’s failure to file a timely notice of appeal or, in the alternative, to grant
it a 10-day extension to file an appellate brief.                The record supports the
Government’s contention.           Johnson’s notice of appeal was filed after the
expiration of the time for filing a timely notice of appeal and beyond the time
during which the district court could have extended the time for filing a notice
of appeal. See FED. R. APP. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i), (b)(4). We therefore dismiss this
appeal as untimely. See id.; see also United States v. Garcia-Cabrera, 472 F.
App’x 340, 341 (5th Cir. 2012)(dismissing sentencing appeal as untimely). 1
       The Government’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the appeal is
DISMISSED as untimely. All other motions are DENIED.




       1Mindful  that the time to appeal is not jurisdictional in a criminal case, we note that
even if we pretermitted the issue of whether Johnson filed a timely notice of appeal and
addressed the merits of the case, his appeal would fail. See United States v. Martinez, 
496 F.3d 387
, 389 (5th Cir. 2007). As Johnson was sentenced before the FSA’s effective date to
the statutory minimum of 120 months of imprisonment, he was not eligible for a § 3582(c)(2)
reduction. See United States v. Kelly, 
716 F.3d 180
, 181 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 
134 S. Ct. 439
(2013). Accordingly, Johnson cannot present a nonfrivolous issue, and the appeal would have
to be dismissed as frivolous. See 
Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202
n.24; Howard v. King, 
707 F.2d 215
,
220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                               2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer