Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Alamo Aviation, Inc. v. World Wide Airlines, 21923 (1965)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 21923 Visitors: 25
Filed: May 04, 1965
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 342 F.2d 997 ALAMO AVIATION, INC., Appellant, v. WORLD WIDE AIRLINES, Appellee. No. 21923. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. April 5, 1965, Rehearing Denied May 4, 1965. John H. Wood, Jr., and Beckmann, Stanard, Wood & Vance, San Antonio, Tex., for appellant. Josh H. Groce, Jack Hebdon, San Antonio, Tex., Phillip D. Bostick, Washington, D.C., Groce, Hebdon, Fahey & Smith, San Antonio, Tex., and Shaw, Pittman, Potts, Trowbridge & Madden, Washington, D.C., for appellee. Before WOODBURY
More

342 F.2d 997

ALAMO AVIATION, INC., Appellant,
v.
WORLD WIDE AIRLINES, Appellee.

No. 21923.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

April 5, 1965, Rehearing Denied May 4, 1965.

John H. Wood, Jr., and Beckmann, Stanard, Wood & Vance, San Antonio, Tex., for appellant.

Josh H. Groce, Jack Hebdon, San Antonio, Tex., Phillip D. Bostick, Washington, D.C., Groce, Hebdon, Fahey & Smith, San Antonio, Tex., and Shaw, Pittman, Potts, Trowbridge & Madden, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before WOODBURY,1 JONES and GEWIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The appellant urges that there were improper statements in the jury argument of appellee's counsel. We are convinced from an examination of the jury arguments of all counsel that the appellant was not prejudiced by any improper comments of the appellee's attorney. Other assignments of error raise questions as to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and judgment. The evidence was ample. The judgment of the district court is

2

Affirmed.

1

Senior Judge of the First Circuit, sitting by designation

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer