Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Gonzalez, 01-10958 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-10958 Visitors: 19
Filed: Mar. 04, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-10958 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RICARDO GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:00-CR-266-8-X - March 1, 2002 Before JONES, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Attorney Adrianna Martinez Goodland appointed to represent Ricardo Gonzalez (“Gonzalez”) has requested leave to withdraw and
More
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 01-10958
                          Summary Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICARDO GONZALEZ,

                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Northern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 3:00-CR-266-8-X
                       --------------------
                           March 1, 2002

Before JONES, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Attorney Adrianna Martinez Goodland appointed to represent

Ricardo Gonzalez (“Gonzalez”) has requested leave to withdraw and

has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).    Gonzalez has not responded to the motion.   Our

independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issues for appeal.    Counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED.    See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                         No.
                         -2-

MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer