Filed: Feb. 25, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-20503 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SCOTTIE DEWAYNE NELSON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-728-ALL - February 21, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Scottie Dewayne Nelson appeals his guilty-plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm possessed in a
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-20503 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SCOTTIE DEWAYNE NELSON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-728-ALL - February 21, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Scottie Dewayne Nelson appeals his guilty-plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm possessed in an..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-20503
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SCOTTIE DEWAYNE NELSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-00-CR-728-ALL
--------------------
February 21, 2002
Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Scottie Dewayne Nelson appeals his guilty-plea conviction
for being a felon in possession of a firearm possessed in and
affecting interstate commerce, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
§§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). He contends that the factual basis
was insufficient to support the interstate commerce element of an
18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) offense and that this court should
reconsider its jurisprudence regarding the constitutionality of
18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) in light of Jones v. United States,
529
U.S. 848 (2000), and United States v. Morrison,
529 U.S. 598
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-20503
-2-
(2000).
“This court has repeatedly emphasized that the
constitutionality of § 922(g)(1) is not open to question.” See
United States v. De Leon,
170 F.3d 494, 499 (5th Cir. 1999);
United States v. Daugherty,
264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001).
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.