Filed: Mar. 08, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-60155 JESUS J. CARDENAS-LARA, Petitioner, versus JOHN ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent. - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A90-732-292 - March 7, 2002 Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jesus J. Cardenas-Lara petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) holding that Cardenas- Lara’s state conviction for felony driving whil
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-60155 JESUS J. CARDENAS-LARA, Petitioner, versus JOHN ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent. - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A90-732-292 - March 7, 2002 Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jesus J. Cardenas-Lara petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) holding that Cardenas- Lara’s state conviction for felony driving while..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-60155
JESUS J. CARDENAS-LARA,
Petitioner,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT,
ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent.
--------------------
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
BIA No. A90-732-292
--------------------
March 7, 2002
Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jesus J. Cardenas-Lara petitions for review of an order of
the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) holding that Cardenas-
Lara’s state conviction for felony driving while intoxicated was
an aggravated felony warranting his removal from this country.
The respondent has moved to dismiss the petition for review and
to remand the case to the BIA for reconsideration in light of
United States v. Chapa-Garza,
243 F.3d 921, 927 (5th Cir. 2001).
Cardenas-Lara has not replied to the respondent’s motion to
remand.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-60155
-2-
Cardenas-Lara’s petition for review is GRANTED. The order
of the BIA is VACATED, and this case is REMANDED to the BIA for
disposition consistent with
Chapa-Garza, 243 F.3d at 927. All
other outstanding motions are DENIED.