Filed: Apr. 12, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-40998 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RODNEY CAREY PALMER, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:00-CR-103 - April 11, 2002 Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rodney Carey Palmer has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as re
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-40998 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RODNEY CAREY PALMER, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:00-CR-103 - April 11, 2002 Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rodney Carey Palmer has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as req..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-40998
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RODNEY CAREY PALMER,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:00-CR-103
--------------------
April 11, 2002
Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rodney
Carey Palmer has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Although Palmer was notified of his right to respond to his
counsel’s motion, Palmer has not filed a response.
Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.