Filed: Apr. 12, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-50507 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus STEVEN ALEXANDER SALMON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. P-00-CR-4-1 - April 11, 2002 Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Steven Alexander Salmon has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by An
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-50507 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus STEVEN ALEXANDER SALMON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. P-00-CR-4-1 - April 11, 2002 Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Steven Alexander Salmon has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by And..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-50507
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
STEVEN ALEXANDER SALMON,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. P-00-CR-4-1
--------------------
April 11, 2002
Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Steven Alexander Salmon has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Salmon has not filed
a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
