Filed: Apr. 25, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-50539 Summary Calendar CARLOS SEGURA; JUAN A. GARCIA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES; MICHAEL MASON; DEBORAH BILLA; GENEVIEVE MANLEY; CYNTHIA J. HAHN; TIMOTHY REZNICEK; PHILIP V. JONES; JAMES DOE, One; JAMES DOE, Two; DELORES TORRES; J. M. LINDSEY, in his individual and official capacity; KAREN B. LINDSEY, Individual and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States Dis
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-50539 Summary Calendar CARLOS SEGURA; JUAN A. GARCIA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES; MICHAEL MASON; DEBORAH BILLA; GENEVIEVE MANLEY; CYNTHIA J. HAHN; TIMOTHY REZNICEK; PHILIP V. JONES; JAMES DOE, One; JAMES DOE, Two; DELORES TORRES; J. M. LINDSEY, in his individual and official capacity; KAREN B. LINDSEY, Individual and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States Dist..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-50539 Summary Calendar CARLOS SEGURA; JUAN A. GARCIA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES; MICHAEL MASON; DEBORAH BILLA; GENEVIEVE MANLEY; CYNTHIA J. HAHN; TIMOTHY REZNICEK; PHILIP V. JONES; JAMES DOE, One; JAMES DOE, Two; DELORES TORRES; J. M. LINDSEY, in his individual and official capacity; KAREN B. LINDSEY, Individual and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees. __________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (No. 00-CV-229) ________________________________________________ April 24, 2002 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Having reviewed the parties’ briefs in light of the record excerpts and applicable authorities, we affirm for essentially the same reasons contained in the magistrate judge’s report, as approved by the district court. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. AFFIRMED. 2
