Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Morales, 01-50968 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-50968 Visitors: 42
Filed: Apr. 22, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-50968 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARMILLA RAQUEL MORALES, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-01-CR-276-1-WWJ - April 19, 2002 Before JONES, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Attorney Walter M. Reaves, Jr. appointed to represent Armilla Raquel Morales (“Morales”) has requested leave to wit
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 01-50968
                          Summary Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARMILLA RAQUEL MORALES,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Texas
                   USDC No. DR-01-CR-276-1-WWJ
                       --------------------
                          April 19, 2002

Before JONES, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Attorney Walter M. Reaves, Jr. appointed to represent

Armilla Raquel Morales (“Morales”) has requested leave to

withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).   Morales filed a response

requesting that this court dismiss her appeal.   Our independent

review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal.   Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 01-50968
                                -2-

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and

the appeal is DISMISSED.   See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

     MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer