Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Scott Panetti v. William Stephens, Director, 14-70037 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 14-70037 Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-70037 Document: 00512855649 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/03/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 14-70037 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED SCOTT PANETTI December 3, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Petitioner - Appellant Clerk v. WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, Respondent - Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CV-42 Before S
More
     Case: 14-70037         Document: 00512855649         Page: 1    Date Filed: 12/03/2014




            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                     FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT


                                        No. 14-70037                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                     Fifth Circuit

                                                                                   FILED
SCOTT PANETTI                                                               December 3, 2014
                                                                          Lyle W. Cayce
                                                    Petitioner - Appellant     Clerk
v.

WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL
JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

                                                    Respondent - Appellee




                     Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Western District of Texas
                                USDC No. 1:04-CV-42


Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and OWEN, Circuit
Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       We STAY the execution pending further order of the court to allow us to
fully consider the late arriving and complex legal questions at issue in this
matter. 1 An order setting a briefing schedule and oral argument will follow.




       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
       1   See 28 U.S.C. ยง 2251(a)(3); McFarland v. Scott, 
512 U.S. 849
, 858 (1994).

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer