Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Robert Rackstraw, 14-10199 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 14-10199 Visitors: 15
Filed: Dec. 16, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-10199 Document: 00512871288 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/16/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 14-10199 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 16, 2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. ROBERT CHRISTOPHER RACKSTRAW, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13-CR-149-1 Before KING, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge
More
     Case: 14-10199      Document: 00512871288         Page: 1    Date Filed: 12/16/2014




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT


                                    No. 14-10199
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                        December 16, 2014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROBERT CHRISTOPHER RACKSTRAW,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:13-CR-149-1


Before KING, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Robert Christopher
Rackstraw has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967), and United States v. Flores, 
632 F.3d 229
(5th Cir. 2011).        Rackstraw has not filed a response.                 We have
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 14-10199    Document: 00512871288     Page: 2   Date Filed: 12/16/2014


                                 No. 14-10199

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                       2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer