Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Cecilio Mendez Mendez v. Eric Holder, Jr., 13-60293 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 13-60293 Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 19, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-60293 Document: 00512877053 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/19/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 13-60293 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED CECILIO MENDEZ MENDEZ, December 19, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Petitioner Clerk v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A037-001-280 Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Order of the Boar
More
Case: 13-60293 Document: 00512877053 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/19/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 13-60293 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED CECILIO MENDEZ MENDEZ, December 19, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Petitioner Clerk v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A037-001-280 Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals is reviewed and its order of removal is vacated for the following reason. The record shows a full concession, by an attorney at the initial hearing, of all charges for removability made by the government in its Notice to Appear. However, both the IJ and BIA granted the removal because, by common sense, they saw the conduct of Mendez to be a crime for which he was convicted. The * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 13-60293 Document: 00512877053 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/19/2014 No. 13-60293 government does not contend that the initial concession should affect our decision. The problem is that the record shows no conviction of an aggravated felony – or of the sexual abuse of a minor. We may know that the conduct of Mendez would support a conviction of a crime charged, but none of the statutes require violence or force or sexual abuse of a minor for conviction. Therefore, it is not shown that any conviction met the categorical compatibility required to justify Mendez’s deportation. Review GRANTED and Order of Removal VACATED. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer