Case: 14-40915      Document: 00512932021         Page: 1    Date Filed: 02/10/2015




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                          United States Court of Appeals

                                    No. 14-40915
                                                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                                                                 FILED
                                  Summary Calendar                        February 10, 2015
                                                                            Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                        Clerk


                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LEONEL JUAREZ-GUERRERO,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 7:14-CR-23


Before SMITH, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Leonel Juarez-
Guerrero has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 

(1967), and United States v. Flores, 

(5th Cir. 2011). Juarez-Guerrero has not filed a response. We have
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 14-40915    Document: 00512932021     Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/10/2015


                                 No. 14-40915

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2, and in part as moot. See United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 

, 382-83 (5th Cir. 2007).




                                       2