Filed: Feb. 10, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-11169 Document: 00512932506 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/10/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 13-11169 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, February 10, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Plaintiff - Appellee Clerk v. RODNEY DEWAYNE WOMACK, Defendant - Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:13-CR-90 Before REAVLEY, JONES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The judgmen
Summary: Case: 13-11169 Document: 00512932506 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/10/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 13-11169 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, February 10, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Plaintiff - Appellee Clerk v. RODNEY DEWAYNE WOMACK, Defendant - Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:13-CR-90 Before REAVLEY, JONES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The judgment..
More
Case: 13-11169 Document: 00512932506 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/10/2015
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-11169 United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, February 10, 2015
Lyle W. Cayce
Plaintiff - Appellee Clerk
v.
RODNEY DEWAYNE WOMACK,
Defendant - Appellant
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:13-CR-90
Before REAVLEY, JONES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The defendant waived
his right to appeal except for the right to appeal the voluntariness of his guilty
plea, ineffectiveness of counsel, or a sentencing error or exceeding the statutory
maximum punishment. Of those exceptions from the right to appeal,
defendant appeals to this court only the voluntariness of his appeal. The plea
agreement and defendant’s assurance to the court displays no confusion and
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 13-11169 Document: 00512932506 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/10/2015
No. 13-11169
established his knowledge of his rights and that he fully understood his waiver.
He is now held to his agreement. See United States v. McKinney,
406 F.3d 744
(5th Cir. 2005); United States v. Portillo,
18 F.3d 290 (5th Cir. 1994).
AFFIRMED.
2