Filed: Jun. 20, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-20213 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JEREMY MICHAEL JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-582-1 - June 18, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Jeremy Michael Jackson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a bri
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-20213 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JEREMY MICHAEL JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-582-1 - June 18, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Jeremy Michael Jackson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brie..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-20213
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JEREMY MICHAEL JACKSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-00-CR-582-1
--------------------
June 18, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Jeremy Michael Jackson
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required
by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Jackson has not
filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the
record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-21213
-2-
is excused from further responsibility herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.