Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Resendez-Olvera, 01-20821 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-20821 Visitors: 54
Filed: Jun. 20, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-20821 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE PILAR RESENDEZ-OLVERA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-334-1 - June 19, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jose Pilar Resendez-Olvera appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to a charge of being fou
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 01-20821
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE PILAR RESENDEZ-OLVERA,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. H-00-CR-334-1
                      --------------------
                          June 19, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Jose Pilar Resendez-Olvera appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea to a charge of being found in the

United States after deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

He contends that the aggravated felony conviction that resulted

in his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) was an

element of the offense that should have been charged in the

indictment.


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 01-20821
                               -2-

     Resendez-Olvera acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed

by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United

States, 
523 U.S. 224
(1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue

for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v.

New Jersey, 
530 U.S. 466
(2000).

     Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres.   See 
Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 489-90
; see also United States v. Dabeit, 
231 F.3d 979
, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 
531 U.S. 1202
(2001).

Resendez-Olvera’s argument is foreclosed.   Accordingly, the

district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer