Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Craig Pipps, 14-40317 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 14-40317 Visitors: 38
Filed: Apr. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-40317 Document: 00513012917 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/21/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 14-40317 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 21, 2015 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. CRAIG PIPPS, also known as Lone Wolf, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:12-CR-119-5 Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Ju
More
     Case: 14-40317      Document: 00513012917         Page: 1    Date Filed: 04/21/2015




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT


                                    No. 14-40317
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                            April 21, 2015
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CRAIG PIPPS, also known as Lone Wolf,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Eastern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 1:12-CR-119-5


Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Craig Pipps has moved for leave to
withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967), and United States v. Flores, 
632 F.3d 229
(5th Cir. 2011).
Pipps has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us
to make a fair evaluation of Pipps’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel;
we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 14-40317       Document: 00513012917   Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/21/2015


                                  No. 14-40317

review. See United States v. Isgar, 
739 F.3d 829
, 841 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,
135 S. Ct. 123
(2014).
      We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
reflected therein, as well as Pipps’s response.      We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Pipps’s request to relieve counsel and to proceed pro se is
DENIED as untimely. See United States v. Wagner, 
158 F.3d 901
, 902-03 (5th
Cir. 1998).




                                        2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer