Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Gramajo-Muralles, 01-40886 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-40886 Visitors: 53
Filed: Jun. 20, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-40886 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GERMAN ALONSO GRAMAJO-MURALLES, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-01-CR-126-1 - - - - - - - - - - June 19, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender representing German Alonso Gramajo-Mur
More
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 01-40886
                         Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GERMAN ALONSO GRAMAJO-MURALLES,

                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                       - - - - - - - - - -
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. B-01-CR-126-1
                       - - - - - - - - - -
                          June 19, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender representing German Alonso

Gramajo-Muralles has requested leave to withdraw as counsel and

has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).    Gramajo-Muralles has not filed a response.   Our

independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 01-40886
                               -2-

responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED.   See 5TH CIR. R.

42.2.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer