Filed: Jun. 21, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-50380 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE BASILIO MARTINEZ-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-00-CR-482-1 - - - - - - - - - - June 18, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Jose Basilio Martinez-Rodriguez has f
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-50380 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE BASILIO MARTINEZ-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-00-CR-482-1 - - - - - - - - - - June 18, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Jose Basilio Martinez-Rodriguez has fi..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-50380
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE BASILIO MARTINEZ-RODRIGUEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. DR-00-CR-482-1
- - - - - - - - - -
June 18, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Jose Basilio Martinez-Rodriguez
has filed a motion for leave to withdraw and a brief in support
of the motion as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Martinez-Rodriguez has not filed a response.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses
no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.