Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Ramirez-Diaz, 01-20616 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-20616 Visitors: 34
Filed: Jul. 17, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-20616 Summary Calendar USDC No. H-01-CR-80-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CESAR ALEJANDRO RAMIREZ-DIAZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas - July 16, 2002 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Cesar Alejandro Ramirez-Diaz has moved for leave to withdraw and has
More
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT


                             No. 01-20616
                           Summary Calendar
                        USDC No. H-01-CR-80-1


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CESAR ALEJANDRO RAMIREZ-DIAZ,
                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                      --------------------
                          July 16, 2002

Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Cesar

Alejandro Ramirez-Diaz has moved for leave to withdraw and has

filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).    Ramirez-Diaz was notified of counsel’s motion and

brief and did not file a response.

     Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further




     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                               No.
                               -2-

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.   See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer