Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Robert Lee and E. B. Siegel, 26892 (1968)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 26892 Visitors: 168
Filed: Nov. 15, 1968
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 404 F.2d 68 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert LEE and E. B. Siegel, Defendants-Appellants. No. 26892. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. Nov. 15, 1968. David S. Eisenberg, David N. Levine, Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-appellants. Floyd M. Buford, Macon, Ga., for plaintiff-appellee. Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge, and TAYLOR, District Judge. PER CURIAM. 1 Appellants, Defendants below, were adjudged guilty of criminal contempt under 18
More

404 F.2d 68

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Robert LEE and E. B. Siegel, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 26892.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 15, 1968.

David S. Eisenberg, David N. Levine, Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-appellants.

Floyd M. Buford, Macon, Ga., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge, and TAYLOR, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

Appellants, Defendants below, were adjudged guilty of criminal contempt under 18 U.S.C. 401 for failing to obey a subpoena duces tecum issued and served on behalf of the United States in a criminal prosecution. The judgment required Robert Lee to serve 40 days imprisonment or pay a fine of $400.00 and E. B. Siegel to serve 50 days imprisonment or pay a fine of $500.00. Appellants paid their fines in lieu of imprisonment and thereafter filed notice of appeal. Appellee now moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the cause is moot.

2

No application for stay as provided in Rule 38(a)(3), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, was sought until November 1, 1968, approximately one month after the fines were paid in full.

3

Appellee's Motion is well taken. Tessmer v. United States, 328 F.2d 306 (5 Cir. 1964), wherein the Court said:

4

We find it unnecessary to discuss the merits of this appeal. The satisfaction of the judgment by the payment of the fine rendered this case moot. Murrell v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 253 F.2d 267, cert. den'd 358 U.S. 841, 79 S. Ct. 65, 3 L. Ed. 2d 76.

5

The appeal is dismissed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer