Filed: Jul. 17, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-40136 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus HARRY GUILLORY, JR., Defendant- Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:00-CR-25-ALL - July 11, 2002 Before JOLLY, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Harry Guillory, Jr., on appeal has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a b
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-40136 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus HARRY GUILLORY, JR., Defendant- Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:00-CR-25-ALL - July 11, 2002 Before JOLLY, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Harry Guillory, Jr., on appeal has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a br..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-40136
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
HARRY GUILLORY, JR.,
Defendant-
Appellant.
----------------------------------------------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:00-CR-25-ALL
----------------------------------------------------------
July 11, 2002
Before JOLLY, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Harry Guillory, Jr., on appeal has
requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Guillory has not responded to the motion. Our independent review of the brief and the
record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is dismissed from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-40136
-2-
MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.