Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Crawford v. City of Richardson, 01-11007 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-11007 Visitors: 20
Filed: Aug. 08, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-11007 Summary Calendar DANNY O. CRAWFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus CITY OF RICHARDSON, Defendant-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (3:98-CV-731-L) - August 7, 2002 Before DAVIS, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Plaintiff-Appellant Danny O. Crawford appeals the district court’s take-nothing judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee (“the City”) fol
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-11007 Summary Calendar DANNY O. CRAWFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus CITY OF RICHARDSON, Defendant-Appellee. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (3:98-CV-731-L) -------------------- August 7, 2002 Before DAVIS, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Plaintiff-Appellant Danny O. Crawford appeals the district court’s take-nothing judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee (“the City”) following a bench trial. Crawford asserts seven issues, challenging, inter alia, the sufficiency of the evidence to support the factual findings of the City’s Civil Service Board and the district court, and the legal conclusions of that court. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. We have reviewed the record on appeal, the appellate briefs of the parties, and the extensive Memorandum Opinion and Order of the district court, which fully explicates the operative facts and pertinent law. We are convinced by our review that the district court’s thorough disposition of Crawford’s largely meritless case correctly applied the pertinent law to the material facts. Essentially for the reasons set forth by the district court in its comprehensive opinion, the judgment of that court is, in all respects, AFFIRMED. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer