Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

The Oglethorpe Company, Peachtree-Chamblee Company and the Golf Club Company v. Robert Weaver, Charles L. Goodson and Beverly B. Bates, 27933 (1970)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 27933 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 14, 1970
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 420 F.2d 696 The OGLETHORPE COMPANY, Peachtree-Chamblee Company and the Golf Club Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Robert WEAVER, Charles L. Goodson and Beverly B. Bates, Defendants-Appellees. No. 27933. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. January 14, 1970. Taylor W. Jones, Mitchell, Clarke, Pate & Anderson, Atlanta, Ga., for appellants. John W. Stokes, Jr., U. S. Atty., Beverly B. Bates, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for appellees. Before BELL, AINSWORTH, and CARSWELL, Circuit Ju
More

420 F.2d 696

The OGLETHORPE COMPANY, Peachtree-Chamblee Company and the Golf Club Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Robert WEAVER, Charles L. Goodson and Beverly B. Bates, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 27933.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

January 14, 1970.

Taylor W. Jones, Mitchell, Clarke, Pate & Anderson, Atlanta, Ga., for appellants.

John W. Stokes, Jr., U. S. Atty., Beverly B. Bates, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for appellees.

Before BELL, AINSWORTH, and CARSWELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The complaint involved in this appeal was brought to set aside foreclosure sales. The foreclosures were made pursuant to powers of sale contained in security deeds which had been assigned to the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. The properties in question were purchased at the sales by the Secretary.

2

Appellants, plaintiffs in the district court, contend that the bidding at the sales was chilled. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Secretary on the basis that appellants had neither paid nor tendered the principal and interest admitted to be due on the indebtedness underlying the security deeds. This is the applicable law absent some equitable ground for excusing the necessity of a tender and no such ground was asserted in the complaint. See O'Kelly v. Evans, 224 Ga. 49, 159 S.E.2d 418 (1968); Auld v. Cobb Exchange Bank, 204 Ga. 729, 51 S.E.2d 635 (1949); Harton v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia, 187 Ga. 700, 2 S.E.2d 62 (1939); Biggers v. Home Building and Loan Association, 179 Ga. 429, 176 S.E. 38 (1934).

3

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer