Filed: Sep. 24, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-20820 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE GARCIA-MARINES, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas (H-00-CR-872-3) September 20, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Attorney Robert W. Higgason, court-appointed counsel for Jose Garcia-Marines, moves for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-20820 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE GARCIA-MARINES, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas (H-00-CR-872-3) September 20, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Attorney Robert W. Higgason, court-appointed counsel for Jose Garcia-Marines, moves for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-20820
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE GARCIA-MARINES,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Southern District of Texas
(H-00-CR-872-3)
September 20, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Attorney Robert W. Higgason, court-appointed counsel for Jose
Garcia-Marines, moves for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
as required by Anders v. California.1 Garcia has not filed a
response.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
1
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
no nonfrivolous issue on appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
