Filed: Oct. 31, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-20524 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BILLY RAY ISHUP, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-584-1 - October 30, 2002 Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Billy Ray Ishup appeals his conviction for distribution of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841, which he contends i
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-20524 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BILLY RAY ISHUP, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-584-1 - October 30, 2002 Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Billy Ray Ishup appeals his conviction for distribution of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841, which he contends is..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-20524
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BILLY RAY ISHUP,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-00-CR-584-1
--------------------
October 30, 2002
Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Billy Ray Ishup appeals his conviction for distribution of
cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841, which he contends
is unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey,
530 U.S.
466 (2000). Ishup concedes that this argument is foreclosed.
See United States v. Slaughter,
238 F.3d 580, 582 (5th Cir.
2000), cert. denied.,
532 U.S. 1045 (2001). He seeks to preserve
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-20524
-2-
his argument for Supreme Court review. The judgment of the
district court is AFFIRMED.