Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Pena, 01-41460 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-41460 Visitors: 37
Filed: Oct. 31, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-41460 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAVIER PENA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-01-CR-864-ALL - October 30, 2002 Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Javier Pena appeals his 30-month prison sentence, imposed following his plea of guilty to a charge of being found in the Unite
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 01-41460
                        Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAVIER PENA,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                    USDC No. L-01-CR-864-ALL
                      --------------------
                        October 30, 2002

Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Javier Pena appeals his 30-month prison sentence, imposed

following his plea of guilty to a charge of being found in the

United States after deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

He contends that the felony conviction that resulted in his

increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) was an element of

the offense that should have been charged in the indictment.

     Pena acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by the

Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224
(1998), but he seeks to preserve his contention for


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 01-41460
                                -2-

Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 
530 U.S. 466
(2000).   Apprendi, however, did not overrule

Almendarez-Torres.   See 
Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 490
; United States

v. Dabeit, 
231 F.3d 979
, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied,

531 U.S. 1202
(2001).   Pena’s argument is foreclosed.   The

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer