Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Rodriguez-Luevanos, 01-50626 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-50626 Visitors: 23
Filed: Oct. 31, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-50626 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus HIPOLITO RODRIGUEZ-LUEVANOS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-00-CR-719-2 - October 30, 2002 Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Bryan P. Cartall, court-appointed counsel for Hipolito Rodriguez-Luevanos (Rodriguez), has requested leave to wi
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 01-50626
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HIPOLITO RODRIGUEZ-LUEVANOS,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Texas
                     USDC No. DR-00-CR-719-2
                       --------------------
                         October 30, 2002

Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Bryan P. Cartall, court-appointed counsel for Hipolito

Rodriguez-Luevanos (Rodriguez), has requested leave to withdraw

and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).   Rodriguez has not filed a response.   Our

independent view of the record and the brief discloses no

nonfrivolous issues for appeal.   Counsel’s motion for leave to




     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 01-50626
                               -2-

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED.   See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.

     MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer